Kommentare zu: Lazy vs. Eager Loading in Hibernate http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:39:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 Von: Madbid review http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-59788 Madbid review Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:16:59 +0000 http://dynatrace.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/#comment-59788 It is very interesting to see the difference between lazy and eager load times and their outcomes, thanks for posting It is very interesting to see the difference between lazy and eager load times and their outcomes, thanks for posting

]]> Von: Arno http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-32439 Arno Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:45:30 +0000 http://dynatrace.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/#comment-32439 I suppose you were using HQL? HQL ignores the fetch configuration (in contrast to Criteria queries, unless you change FetchMode on Criteria itself). HQL only fetches what you tell it to fetch. Also, I personally prefer to define lazy-loading for all associations (by the way, setting batch-size or fetch="subselect" will prevent N+1 selects), and then override this behavior on a per-query basis, in order to achieve eager fetching when needed. Otherwise you might end up with eager loading when not desired. I suppose you were using HQL? HQL ignores the fetch configuration (in contrast to Criteria queries, unless you change FetchMode on Criteria itself). HQL only fetches what you tell it to fetch.

Also, I personally prefer to define lazy-loading for all associations (by the way, setting batch-size or fetch=”subselect” will prevent N+1 selects), and then override this behavior on a per-query basis, in order to achieve eager fetching when needed. Otherwise you might end up with eager loading when not desired.

]]> Von: Senthil http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-4226 Senthil Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:09:29 +0000 http://dynatrace.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/#comment-4226 If the same is written with Criteria then it will work as expected. If the same is written with Criteria then it will work as expected.

]]> Von: nyuby http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-3241 nyuby Thu, 14 May 2009 05:24:27 +0000 http://dynatrace.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/#comment-3241 Nice tutorial....thanks, Nice tutorial….thanks,

]]> Von: miluch http://blog.dynatrace.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-2174 miluch Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:18:31 +0000 http://dynatrace.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/lazy-vs-eager-loading-in-hibernate/#comment-2174 it is all because hql does not take into consideration your lazy/eager settings. it is all because hql does not take into consideration your lazy/eager settings.

]]>